Cuba says it killed heavily armed exiles who attacked from US-registered speedboat

· · 来源:user资讯

One thing that allowed software to evolve much faster than most other human fields is the fact the discipline is less anchored to patents and protections (and this, in turn, is likely as it is because of a sharing culture around the software). If the copyright law were more stringent, we could likely not have what we have today. Is the protection of single individuals' interests and companies more important than the general evolution of human culture? I don’t think so, and, besides, the copyright law is a common playfield: the rules are the same for all. Moreover, it is not a stretch to say that despite a more relaxed approach, software remains one of the fields where it is simpler to make money; it does not look like the business side was impacted by the ability to reimplement things. Probably, the contrary is true: think of how many businesses were made possible by an open source software stack (not that OSS is mostly made of copies, but it definitely inherited many ideas about past systems). I believe, even with AI, those fundamental tensions remain all valid. Reimplementations are cheap to make, but this is the new playfield for all of us, and just reimplementing things in an automated fashion, without putting something novel inside, in terms of ideas, engineering, functionalities, will have modest value in the long run. What will matter is the exact way you create something: Is it well designed, interesting to use, supported, somewhat novel, fast, documented and useful? Moreover, this time the inbalance of force is in the right direction: big corporations always had the ability to spend obscene amounts of money in order to copy systems, provide them in a way that is irresistible for users (free, for many years, for instance, to later switch model) and position themselves as leaders of ideas they didn’t really invent. Now, small groups of individuals can do the same to big companies' software systems: they can compete on ideas now that a synthetic workforce is cheaper for many.

Appears 12–18 months late

fiction sales,推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息

Continue reading...。PDF资料对此有专业解读

Go to worldnews

自殺・自傷行為に関す

关于作者

徐丽,独立研究员,专注于数据分析与市场趋势研究,多篇文章获得业内好评。

分享本文:微信 · 微博 · QQ · 豆瓣 · 知乎

网友评论

  • 专注学习

    写得很好,学到了很多新知识!

  • 信息收集者

    专业性很强的文章,推荐阅读。

  • 信息收集者

    这篇文章分析得很透彻,期待更多这样的内容。

  • 资深用户

    难得的好文,逻辑清晰,论证有力。

  • 持续关注

    这篇文章分析得很透彻,期待更多这样的内容。